Four people want four different things and one of you has to decide
Most tools start once those four people agree. This is for the week before: the interview notes, the funnel numbers, and what Joe said on the call go onto one canvas, each piece linked to the claim it speaks to. Then you can see which of the four opinions survives.
1 · Bring the agent you already pay for
Meridian speaks Model Context Protocol, so Claude, Codex and Cursor connect straight into your projects with a self-service API key. No waitlist.
2 · Prima can never do more than you can
She acts on your behalf, inside your permissions, and the database stops her at the edge of them. She cannot open a project you weren't invited to. Some things stay human-only - deleting a project is one of them.
3 · Another organization can never see your work
Enforced in the database on every request. A page cannot show what the database never returns.
Prima works on the canvas, next to you
She reads the evidence already sitting there - no pasting the project into a chat window to get started - and writes back to the same canvas with her name on whatever she made.
Every investigation, and what state it's in
Open ones, concluded ones, and how much evidence has piled up behind each. The activity rail shows who touched what. Prima sits in that rail with your teammates, because she is one.
Some days you just want the list
The same investigations in a sortable table - owner, due date, and whether the question is still open - for the people who don't think in canvases.
Every chat says which investigation it belongs to
The thread with the good answer about pricing is findable next quarter, attached to the investigation it came from, instead of buried in a general-purpose assistant's history.
